State v. Harris

53 S.W.3d 164, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 970, 2001 WL 641754
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 846
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2001·No. No. ED 78418·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric D. Harris was convicted of robbery in the second degree and sentenced as a prior offender to thirteen years’ imprisonment. Harris appeals, alleging that the trial court plainly erred and abused its discretion by allowing the State to present evidence and comment in closing argument on injuries the victim, received from another person while the robbery occurred.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court’s actions do not constitute plain error under Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harris, 53 S.W.3d 164, 2001 Mo. App. LEXIS 970, 2001 WL 641754 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001).

53 S.W.3d 164 (State v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.