State v. Harris

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harris

926 S.W.2d 714, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390, 1996 WL 452725

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 13, 1996

DocketNo. WD 50124

StatusPublished

This text of 926 S.W.2d 714 (State v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harris, 926 S.W.2d 714, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390, 1996 WL 452725 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Harris appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of five counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and five counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994; and concurrent sentences of 11, 14, 16, 18 and 20 years imprisonment for the robbery convictions, and five concurrent five-year sentences for the armed criminal action convictions. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief.

The judgment of conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Harris appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, of five counts of robbery in the first degree, § 569.020, RSMo 1994, and five counts of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1994; and concurrent sentences of 11, 14, 16, 18 and 20 years imprisonment for the robbery convictions, and five concurrent five-year sentences for the armed criminal action convictions. He also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief.

The judgment of conviction and the order denying the Rule 29.15 motion are affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

926 S.W.2d 714, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1390, 1996 WL 452725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harris-moctapp-1996.