State v. Harrington
This text of 668 S.E.2d 344 (State v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Keith Edward HARRINGTON.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Glenn Gerding, Southport, for Harrington.
Charles E. Reece, Assistant Attorney General, Garry W. Frank, District Attorney, for State of NC.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 10th day of June 2008 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 10th day of June 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following *345 order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 9th day of October 2008."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
668 S.E.2d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harrington-nc-2008.