State v. Harrington

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Harrington

238 N.W.2d 869, 307 Minn. 483, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1462

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJanuary 16, 1976

DocketNo. 45271

StatusPublished

This text of 238 N.W.2d 869 (State v. Harrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harrington, 238 N.W.2d 869, 307 Minn. 483, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1462 (Mich. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of attempted burglary with a tool, Minn. St. 609.17 and 609.58, subd. 2(1) (a), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 10 years’ imprisonment. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction and the denial of a motion for a new trial, defendant contends that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence to support the verdict and that he was denied due process when the trial court permitted the prosecution to elicit on cross-examination of defendant that he had been convicted of burglary 3 years earlier. After careful consideration, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of a charge of attempted burglary with a tool, Minn. St. 609.17 and 609.58, subd. 2(1) (a), and was sentenced by the trial court to a maximum indeterminate term of 10 years’ imprisonment. On this appeal from the judgment of conviction and the denial of a motion for a new trial, defendant contends that there was as a matter of law insufficient evidence to support the verdict and that he was denied due process when the trial court permitted the prosecution to elicit on cross-examination of defendant that he had been convicted of burglary 3 years earlier. After careful consideration, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 N.W.2d 869, 307 Minn. 483, 1976 Minn. LEXIS 1462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harrington-minn-1976.