State v. Harrell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Harrell

222 So. 3d 30, 2017 WL 2822487

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJune 20, 2017

DocketNo. 2017-KD-1055

StatusPublished

This text of 222 So. 3d 30 (State v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harrell, 222 So. 3d 30, 2017 WL 2822487 (La. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

|J concur with this Court’s denial of the State’s writ. On the showing made, I cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying admissibility of the entire Grand Jury testimony of witness Jessie Perrier. However, to the extent the trial court did not permit the State on redirect to question witness Perrier on statements made to the Grand Jury that are consistent with his in-court testimony, that would, in my view, constitute error. See La. C.E. arts. 611(D) and 801(D)(1)(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons:

|J concur with this Court’s denial of the State’s writ. On the showing made, I cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in denying admissibility of the entire Grand Jury testimony of witness Jessie Perrier. However, to the extent the trial court did not permit the State on redirect to question witness Perrier on statements made to the Grand Jury that are consistent with his in-court testimony, that would, in my view, constitute error. See La. C.E. arts. 611(D) and 801(D)(1)(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 So. 3d 30, 2017 WL 2822487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harrell-la-2017.