State v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Harrell

933 So. 2d 1243, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 2006 WL 2000115

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2006·No. Nos. 3D05-2145, 3D05-2144·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida (“State”), appeals the trial court’s downward departure sentence. The State asserts that the trial court erred in issuing a downward departure sentence without legal justification. The appellee commendably concedes error, and we agree. See § 921.0026, Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Subido, 925 So.2d 1052, 1057 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); State v. Ford, 739 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); State v. Ashley, 549 So.2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing. On remand, Harrell shall have the opportunity to withdraw his plea if he so desires.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State of Florida (“State”), appeals the trial court’s downward departure sentence. The State asserts that the trial court erred in issuing a downward departure sentence without legal justification. The appellee commendably concedes error, and we agree. See § 921.0026, Fla. Stat. (2005); State v. Subido, 925 So.2d 1052, 1057 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); State v. Ford, 739 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); State v. Ashley, 549 So.2d 226 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for re-sentencing. On remand, Harrell shall have the opportunity to withdraw his plea if he so desires.

Reversed and remanded.

State v. Harrell, 933 So. 2d 1243, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 11955, 2006 WL 2000115 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

933 So. 2d 1243 (State v. Harrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related