State v. Harrell

Connecticut Appellate Court

State v. Harrell

559 A.2d 1185, 18 Conn. App. 801, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 83

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedMarch 13, 1989

Docket6960

StatusPublished

This text of 559 A.2d 1185 (State v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harrell, 559 A.2d 1185, 18 Conn. App. 801, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 83 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On September 27, 1983, the defendant was convicted, after a trial to a jury, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2) and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-48 (a). On October 28, 1983, the defendant was sentenced, on the robbery charge, to a term of twenty years, execution suspended after service of fifteen years, and, on the conspiracy to commit robbery charge, to a term of ten years, execution suspended with three years probation.

On the day the defendant was sentenced, an application for waiver of fees, costs and expenses and for the appointment of counsel to appeal the judgment of conviction was filed. Despite the appointment of a number of appellate counsel between January, 1984, and February, 1987, nothing was done to perfect the defendant’s appeal. On the basis of the particular facts of this case, the defendant was allowed to file a late appeal.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we find no error.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On September 27, 1983, the defendant was convicted, after a trial to a jury, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (2) and conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-48 (a). On October 28, 1983, the defendant was sentenced, on the robbery charge, to a term of twenty years, execution suspended after service of fifteen years, and, on the conspiracy to commit robbery charge, to a term of ten years, execution suspended with three years probation.

On the day the defendant was sentenced, an application for waiver of fees, costs and expenses and for the appointment of counsel to appeal the judgment of conviction was filed. Despite the appointment of a number of appellate counsel between January, 1984, and February, 1987, nothing was done to perfect the defendant’s appeal. On the basis of the particular facts of this case, the defendant was allowed to file a late appeal.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record in this case, we find no error.

There is no error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

559 A.2d 1185, 18 Conn. App. 801, 1989 Conn. App. LEXIS 83, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harrell-connappct-1989.