State v. Harper

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Harper

457 S.E.2d 775, 119 N.C. App. 252, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 402

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJune 6, 1995

DocketNo. 935SC21

StatusPublished

This text of 457 S.E.2d 775 (State v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harper, 457 S.E.2d 775, 119 N.C. App. 252, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 402 (N.C. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The evidence presented at trial is summarized in this Court’s prior opinion. Harper, 112 N.C. App. at 636-37, 436 S.E.2d at 412 (Harper I). In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bryant, 337 N.C. 298, 446 S.E.2d 71, we find no error in the trial court’s reasonable doubt instruction. As to the assignments of error raised by defendant and not addressed in Harper I, we have reviewed them and find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges WYNN and JOHN concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

The evidence presented at trial is summarized in this Court’s prior opinion. Harper, 112 N.C. App. at 636-37, 436 S.E.2d at 412 (Harper I). In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Bryant, 337 N.C. 298, 446 S.E.2d 71, we find no error in the trial court’s reasonable doubt instruction. As to the assignments of error raised by defendant and not addressed in Harper I, we have reviewed them and find no prejudicial error.

No error.

Judges WYNN and JOHN concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

457 S.E.2d 775, 119 N.C. App. 252, 1995 N.C. App. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harper-ncctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack