State v. Harper

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harper

336 S.W.3d 486, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 348, 2011 WL 900546

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 15, 2011

DocketED 94782

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 336 S.W.3d 486 (State v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harper, 336 S.W.3d 486, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 348, 2011 WL 900546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Harper (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.170, RSMo 2000, 1 one count of stealing more than $500, in violation of Section 570.030, and one count of possession of burglary tools, in violation of Section 569.180, for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to a total of eight years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI