State v. Harper

336 S.W.3d 486, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 348, 2011 WL 900546
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. ED 94782·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Harper (Defendant) appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of second-degree burglary, in violation of Section 569.170, RSMo 2000, 1 one count of stealing more than $500, in violation of Section 570.030, and one count of possession of burglary tools, in violation of Section 569.180, for which he was sentenced as a persistent offender to a total of eight years’ imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find Defendant is entitled to no relief on appeal. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. Unless otherwise indicated, all further statutory references are to RSMo 2000.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harper, 336 S.W.3d 486, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 348, 2011 WL 900546 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

336 S.W.3d 486 (State v. Harper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harper v. State
390 S.W.3d 180 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)