State v. Harold

546 S.W.3d 582
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 1, 2018
DocketWD 80597
StatusPublished

This text of 546 S.W.3d 582 (State v. Harold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harold, 546 S.W.3d 582 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Stuart Harold appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to show that when he unlawfully entered the Anson residence, he did so with the intent of assaulting Nicholas Haill. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
546 S.W.3d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harold-moctapp-2018.