State v. Harold
546 S.W.3d 582
Opinion
Stuart Harold appeals from a judgment convicting him of burglary in the first degree, arguing that the evidence was insufficient to show that when he unlawfully entered the Anson residence, he did so with the intent of assaulting Nicholas Haill. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Harold, 546 S.W.3d 582 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).
546 S.W.3d 582 (State v. Harold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.