State v. Harold Eimers Smith and Ignacio Puente Jr.
This text of State v. Harold Eimers Smith and Ignacio Puente Jr. (State v. Harold Eimers Smith and Ignacio Puente Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-18-00085-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant,
v.
HAROLD EIMERS SMITH AND IGNACIO PUENTE JR., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez
Appellant, the State of Texas, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal on grounds
that the trial court has granted a motion for new trial, thereby rendering this appeal moot.
The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s motion to dismiss the
appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.
Costs will be taxed against appellant. See id. R. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the
parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at
appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will
issue forthwith.
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice
Delivered and filed the 8th day of March, 2018.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Harold Eimers Smith and Ignacio Puente Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harold-eimers-smith-and-ignacio-puente-jr-texapp-2018.