State v. Harnett County Trust Co.

136 S.E. 732, 193 N.C. 834, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 476
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 2, 1927·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appellants entered a special appearance and moved that as to them the action be dismissed. The motion was denied, and they excepted and appealed.

The appeal must be dismissed. It is fragmentary and premature. An appeal from an interlocutory order will not ordinarily be entertained. Watts v. Staton, 191 N. C., 215; Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632; Mann v. Gibbs, 156 N. C., 44; Turner v. Holden, 109 N. C., 182; Guilford v. Georgia Co., ibid., 310.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harnett County Trust Co., 136 S.E. 732, 193 N.C. 834, 1927 N.C. LEXIS 476 (N.C. 1927).

136 S.E. 732 (State v. Harnett County Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Utilities Com. v. . R. R.
28 S.E.2d 490 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)