State v. Harned

64 A. 1134, 73 N.J.L. 681, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 18, 1906
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 A. 1134 (State v. Harned) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Harned, 64 A. 1134, 73 N.J.L. 681, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106 (N.J. 1906).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Njspca v. Bd. of Ed. of East Orange
219 A.2d 200 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 A. 1134, 73 N.J.L. 681, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harned-nj-1906.