State v. Harned

64 A. 1134, 73 N.J.L. 681, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 18, 1906·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment brought up by this writ of error is affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Mr. Justice Port, in the Supreme Court, in the case of State v. Davis, reported in 43 Vroom 345.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Garrison, Hendrickson, Pitney, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill. 12. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harned, 64 A. 1134, 73 N.J.L. 681, 1906 N.J. LEXIS 106 (N.J. 1906).

64 A. 1134 (State v. Harned) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Njspca v. Bd. of Ed. of East Orange
219 A.2d 200 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)