State v. Harmon

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Harmon

904 P.2d 201, 137 Or. App. 428, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1470

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 25, 1995

Docket94C20620; CA A86441

StatusPublished

This text of 904 P.2d 201 (State v. Harmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harmon, 904 P.2d 201, 137 Or. App. 428, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1470 (Or. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415. He contends that the court erred by not allowing him to collaterally attack the constitutionality of his prior juvenile adjudications in the sentencing process. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree. State v. Stewart/Billings, 321 Or 1, 892 P2d 1013 (1995).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed after he pled guilty to robbery in the first degree, ORS 164.415. He contends that the court erred by not allowing him to collaterally attack the constitutionality of his prior juvenile adjudications in the sentencing process. The state concedes that the court erred. We agree. State v. Stewart/Billings, 321 Or 1, 892 P2d 1013 (1995).

Conviction affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

904 P.2d 201, 137 Or. App. 428, 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harmon-orctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack