State v. Harman

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harman

273 S.W.3d 584, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 20, 2009 WL 113780

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 20, 2009

DocketED 90581

StatusPublished

This text of 273 S.W.3d 584 (State v. Harman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harman, 273 S.W.3d 584, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 20, 2009 WL 113780 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Harman appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 RSMo 2000. 1 Harman was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender and sentenced to life in prison. Harman claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Harman appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of first-degree assault, in violation of Section 565.050 RSMo 2000. 1 Harman was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender and sentenced to life in prison. Harman claims the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

273 S.W.3d 584, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 20, 2009 WL 113780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harman-moctapp-2009.