State v. Harkness

341 S.E.2d 631, 288 S.C. 136, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 309
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 17, 1986·No. 22503·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Appellant was convicted of robbery and petit larceny and sentenced to ten years and thirty days consecutively. We affirm the conviction and sentence for robbery but reverse the larceny conviction and vacate the sentence.

The testimony at trial showed that appellant and another man approached the prosecuting witness in a parking lot, grabbed and shoved her, jerked off both her necklaces, and knocked her down. Although it is apparent that appellant committed both robbery and the lesser-included offense of larceny, punishment for both offenses arising out of the same incident is double jeopardy. State v. Lawson, 279 S. C. 266, 305 S. E. (2d) 249 (1983).

Accordingly, the conviction for petit larceny is reversed and the sentence vacated, and the conviction and sentence for robbery are affirmed. State v. Plemmons, 286 S. C. 78, 332 S. E. (2d) 765 (1985); State v. Scipio, 283 S. C. 124, 322 S. E. (2d) 15 (1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Harkness, 341 S.E.2d 631, 288 S.C. 136, 1986 S.C. LEXIS 309 (S.C. 1986).

341 S.E.2d 631 (State v. Harkness) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Moore
649 S.E.2d 84 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007)
Joseph v. State
571 S.E.2d 280 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
State v. Parker
571 S.E.2d 288 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2002)
State v. Parker
543 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2001)