State v. Harkey

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harkey

568 S.W.3d 88

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 26, 2019

DocketNo. ED 106166

StatusPublished

This text of 568 S.W.3d 88 (State v. Harkey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Harkey, 568 S.W.3d 88 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Benjamin F. Lewis, District Judge

Ryan P. Harkey appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree assault following a jury trial. Because there was no offer of proof before the trial court, we have no statement for which to review admissibility, and we find no plain error in the exclusion of a purported *89statement identified during arguments on pretrial motions. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benjamin F. Lewis, District Judge

Ryan P. Harkey appeals from the judgment entered on his conviction for first-degree assault following a jury trial. Because there was no offer of proof before the trial court, we have no statement for which to review admissibility, and we find no plain error in the exclusion of a purported *89statement identified during arguments on pretrial motions. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 S.W.3d 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-harkey-moctapp-2019.