State v. Hargrove

Superior Court of Delaware

State v. Hargrove

2 Del. 527

DecidedJuly 5, 1832

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Del. 527 (State v. Hargrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hargrove, 2 Del. 527 (Del. Ct. App. 1832).

Pincite

Opinion

Agreement to fight.

If two agree to fight both are guilty; and each may be indicted.Ib. On an indictment for passing counterfeit money, the note mustbe clearly identified. Hargrove was indicted for attempting to pass a counterfeit note to H. F. Rodney. The prisoner was in possession of two counterfeit *Page 528 notes, one of which he offered to J. M'Main, the other to Rodney. Rodney could not say which of the two was offered to him. The court directed an acquittal, because the note charged could not be identified as the one offered to Rodney. State vs. Hargrove. Sussex, Spring Sessions, 1832.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Agreement to fight.

If two agree to fight both are guilty; and each may be indicted.Ib. On an indictment for passing counterfeit money, the note mustbe clearly identified. Hargrove was indicted for attempting to pass a counterfeit note to H. F. Rodney. The prisoner was in possession of two counterfeit *Page 528 notes, one of which he offered to J. M'Main, the other to Rodney. Rodney could not say which of the two was offered to him. The court directed an acquittal, because the note charged could not be identified as the one offered to Rodney. State vs. Hargrove. Sussex, Spring Sessions, 1832.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Del. 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hargrove-delsuperct-1832.