State v. Hardy

441 P.3d 1202, 193 Wash. 2d 1012
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJune 5, 2019
DocketNo. 96917-5
StatusPublished

This text of 441 P.3d 1202 (State v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hardy, 441 P.3d 1202, 193 Wash. 2d 1012 (Wash. 2019).

Opinion

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered the petition for review at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), the trial court may not require an indigent defendant to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee. In addition, RCW 43.43.7541 precludes the imposition of the DNA collection fee if the defendant's DNA has already been collected in connection with a prior conviction. The Department therefore unanimously agreed that the petition for review should be granted as to the $ 200 filing fee issue and the DNA fee. The Department also unanimously agreed that the petition for review raises no other issue that merits this court's consideration.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is granted only on the issue of the challenge to the legal financial obligations. In light of this Court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez, 191 Wn.2d 732, 426 P.3d 714 (2018), and the 2018 amendment to the legal financial obligations statutes, this case is remanded to the trial court to strike the requirement to pay the $ 200 criminal filing fee and to reconsider the imposition of the requirement to pay the DNA fee.

For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Ramirez
426 P.3d 714 (Washington Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
441 P.3d 1202, 193 Wash. 2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardy-wash-2019.