State v. Hardy
Opinion
¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered the petition for review at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar. The Department unanimously agreed that in light of 2018 amendments to the statutes governing legal financial obligations and this court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez,
¶2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶3 That the petition for review is granted only on the issue of the challenge to the legal financial obligations. In light of this Court's decision in State of Washington v. David Angel Ramirez,
For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
441 P.3d 1202 (State v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.