State v. Hardy

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Hardy

863 A.2d 699, 272 Conn. 906, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided December 8, 2004·No. SC 17324·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?

“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”

*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?

“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”

*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

State v. Hardy, 863 A.2d 699, 272 Conn. 906, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566 (Colo. 2004).

Pincite

863 A.2d 699 (State v. Hardy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related