Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Hardy

State v. Hardy

863 A.2d 699, 272 Conn. 906, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedDecember 8, 2004
DocketSC 17324
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 863 A.2d 699 (State v. Hardy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hardy, 863 A.2d 699, 272 Conn. 906, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566 (Colo. 2004).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 85 Conn. App. 708 (AC 23960), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does a ‘firearm’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (19) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?
“2. Does a ‘deadly weapon’ as defined in General Statutes § 53a-3 (6) require that a shot be discharged by gunpowder?”
*907 Decided December 8, 2004 Marjorie Allen Dauster, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Grant
982 A.2d 169 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)
State v. Hardy
896 A.2d 755 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
863 A.2d 699, 272 Conn. 906, 2004 Conn. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardy-conn-2004.