State v. HARDWRICT

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. HARDWRICT

307 S.W.3d 716, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 447, 2010 WL 1460071

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 13, 2010·No. ED 93208·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Moses Hardwrict (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, kidnapping, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court excluding Appellant’s proffered evidence was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Mozee, 112 S.W.3d 102, 105 (Mo.App. W.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *717 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Moses Hardwrict (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, kidnapping, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court excluding Appellant’s proffered evidence was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Mozee, 112 S.W.3d 102, 105 (Mo.App. W.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *717 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

State v. HARDWRICT, 307 S.W.3d 716, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 447, 2010 WL 1460071 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

307 S.W.3d 716 (State v. HARDWRICT) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related