State v. HARDWRICT
This text of 307 S.W.3d 716 (State v. HARDWRICT) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Moses Hardwrict (Appellant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of forcible rape, kidnapping, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the trial court excluding Appellant’s proffered evidence was not an abuse of discretion. State v. Mozee, 112 S.W.3d 102, 105 (Mo.App. W.D.2003). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We *717 affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 S.W.3d 716, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 447, 2010 WL 1460071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardwrict-moctapp-2010.