State v. Hardwick
820 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9433, 2002 WL 1430251
This text of 820 So. 2d 436 (State v. Hardwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Hardwick, 820 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9433, 2002 WL 1430251 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
The state argues, and defendant concedes, that the trial court erred in sentencing him to drug offender probation, because he does not qualify under section 948.084(1), Florida Statutes (2001). We [437]*437therefore reverse defendant’s sentence and remand for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
820 So. 2d 436, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 9433, 2002 WL 1430251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardwick-fladistctapp-2002.