State v. Hardin
This text of 144 P. 1199 (State v. Hardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On April 11, 1914, in the superior court of What-com county, defendant was convicted of maintaining a common nuisance, and he now appeals from the final judgment and sentence entered upon the verdict of the jury.
Appellant was indicted by a grand jury, and moved to quash the indictment for the reason that the grand jury was not summoned, drawn or impaneled as required by law. Error is assigned upon the denial of this motion.
It has been stipulated by the prosecuting attorney and appellant’s counsel that the grand jury which returned the indictment herein was the same grand jury that returned the indictment in State ex rel. Murphy v. Superior Court, ante p. 284, 144 Pac. 32. In that case we held that the grand jury had not been drawn and impaneled as required by law.
In view of the stipulation above mentioned, and upon authority of the Murphy case, and for the reasons therein stated, the judgment of the lower court is reversed, with directions to quash the indictment heretofore filed against appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 P. 1199, 82 Wash. 700, 1914 Wash. LEXIS 1578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardin-wash-1914.