State v. Hardin
This text of 202 N.W.2d 212 (State v. Hardin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This matter comes to us on appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court. The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of *557 that* court and moved to dismiss the complaint against her which charged’ her with carrying a firearm in violation of a city ordinánce. The lower court denied the motion and we dismiss the appeal from that order. \
Under Minn. St. 632.01, an appeal in a criminal case may only be taken from a judgment or order denying a new trial. For purposes of appeal, ordinance violations are considered criminal proceedings. Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 199 N. W. 918 (1924). Thus, the appeal in this case is from a nonappealable order and we therefore dismiss the same.
Appeal ■ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 N.W.2d 212, 294 Minn. 556, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardin-minn-1972.