State v. Hardin

202 N.W.2d 212, 294 Minn. 556, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1467
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided October 27, 1972·No. 43480·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This matter comes to us on appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court. The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of *557 that* court and moved to dismiss the complaint against her which charged’ her with carrying a firearm in violation of a city ordinánce. The lower court denied the motion and we dismiss the appeal from that order. \

Under Minn. St. 632.01, an appeal in a criminal case may only be taken from a judgment or order denying a new trial. For purposes of appeal, ordinance violations are considered criminal proceedings. Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 199 N. W. 918 (1924). Thus, the appeal in this case is from a nonappealable order and we therefore dismiss the same.

Appeal ■ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hardin, 202 N.W.2d 212, 294 Minn. 556, 1972 Minn. LEXIS 1467 (Mich. 1972).

202 N.W.2d 212 (State v. Hardin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Kipp
384 N.W.2d 230 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1986)
Haase v. Haase
369 N.W.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1985)
State v. Myhro
354 N.W.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)