State v. Harden

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Harden

895 S.W.2d 203, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 1995 WL 57884

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 1995·No. No. 63589·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court to twelve years imprisonment. We affirm. We have examined the defendant’s points of error and find them to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction by a jury of armed criminal action, § 571.015, RSMo 1986. He was sentenced by the court to twelve years imprisonment. We affirm. We have examined the defendant’s points of error and find them to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Harden, 895 S.W.2d 203, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 269, 1995 WL 57884 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

895 S.W.2d 203 (State v. Harden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.