State v. Hanshaw

Arizona Supreme Court

State v. Hanshaw

397 P.2d 220, 97 Ariz. 109, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 203

CourtArizona Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 16, 1964

DocketNo. 1530

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 397 P.2d 220 (State v. Hanshaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hanshaw, 397 P.2d 220, 97 Ariz. 109, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 203 (Ark. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant' was charged with ' robbery, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-641 and A.R.S. § 13-643. He pleaded not guilty and was duly tried. The evidence established an employee...was held at gun point while a store was robbed of thirty dollars. Appellant was identified at trial by the employee on whom appellant had held the gun. Appellant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of from1 5 to 10 years.

■ Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-161' to handle his appeal. Counsel advised this court by written communication that he had searched the record and the transcript and was unable to find grounds upon which the appeal could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the record, including the transcript of testimony, we find no grounds upon which the appeal could be based. State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant' was charged with ' robbery, pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-641 and A.R.S. § 13-643. He pleaded not guilty and was duly tried. The evidence established an employee...was held at gun point while a store was robbed of thirty dollars. Appellant was identified at trial by the employee on whom appellant had held the gun. Appellant was sentenced to an indeterminate term of from1 5 to 10 years.

■ Appellant filed his notice of appeal in propria persona and counsel was appointed by the trial court pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-161' to handle his appeal. Counsel advised this court by written communication that he had searched the record and the transcript and was unable to find grounds upon which the appeal could be based. This court ordered the appeal be submitted. On examination of the record, including the transcript of testimony, we find no grounds upon which the appeal could be based. State v. Burrell, 96 Ariz. 233, 393 P.2d 921.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 P.2d 220, 97 Ariz. 109, 1964 Ariz. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hanshaw-ariz-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack