State v. Hanning

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hanning

708 N.E.2d 206, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1725

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 5, 1999

Docket99-437

StatusPublished

This text of 708 N.E.2d 206 (State v. Hanning) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hanning, 708 N.E.2d 206, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1725 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 98AP-380. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment be, and [1439]*1439hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that bond be set at $100,000 and that said bond be filed in accordance with App.R. 7(B).

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 98AP-380. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment be, and [1439]*1439hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that bond be set at $100,000 and that said bond be filed in accordance with App.R. 7(B).

F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 N.E.2d 206, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1438, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hanning-ohio-1999.