State v. Hanni
This text of 263 Mont. 39 (State v. Hanni) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 8, 1992, the Defendant was sentenced to forty (40) years for Sexual Intercourse Without Consent; that he be designated a dangerous offender; and prior to parole the defendant must complete the sexual offender treatment program at the Montana State Prison. The defendant must abide by the list of requirements stated in the December 8,1992 Judgment rendered by Judge Lympus.
On May 7,1993, the Defendant’s application for reivew of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The Defendant was present and represented himself. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the Defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also to increase it if such is possible. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he did not wish to proceed.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for review of sentence shall be dismissed with prejudice with leave to refile at a later time.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 Mont. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hanni-mont-1993.