State v. Hannah

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Hannah

293 S.E.2d 188, 306 N.C. 374, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1451

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 13, 1982

DocketNo. 108A82

StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.E.2d 188 (State v. Hannah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hannah, 293 S.E.2d 188, 306 N.C. 374, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1451 (N.C. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor breaking or entering. The Court of Appeals found no error in the trial. Having carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities on this issue, we conclude that the result reached and the legal principles applied by the Court of Appeals are correct. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The sole issue presented to this Court is whether the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of misdemeanor breaking or entering. The Court of Appeals found no error in the trial. Having carefully reviewed the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals, the dissent, the briefs and authorities on this issue, we conclude that the result reached and the legal principles applied by the Court of Appeals are correct. Consequently, the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 S.E.2d 188, 306 N.C. 374, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hannah-nc-1982.