State v. Hannah

Court of Appeals of Arizona

State v. Hannah

617 P.2d 530, 126 Ariz. 578, 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 712

CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona

DecidedMarch 20, 1980

DocketNo. 2 CA-CIV 3555

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 617 P.2d 530 (State v. Hannah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hannah, 617 P.2d 530, 126 Ariz. 578, 1980 Ariz. App. LEXIS 712 (Ark. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

The state brought this special action to challenge the respondent court’s dismissal of an allegation of prior convictions filed against the real party in interest. We believe the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction and, because the state has no adequate remedy by appeal, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

The real party in interest is charged in the instant case with three Class 2 felonies, all alleged to have been committed on August 10, 1979. The prior convictions which the county attorney alleged in this case were forgery convictions entered on October 22, 1979 for crimes which occurred on November 2 and 3, 1978.

A.R.S. Sec. 13-604(B) provides:

“. .. a person who is at least eighteen years of age or who has been tried as an adult and who stands convicted of a class 2 or 3 felony, whether a completed or preparatory offense and who has previously been convicted of any felony shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not less than the sentence and not more than three times the sentence authorized by § 13-701 for the offense for which the person currently stands convicted, ...”

The foregoing section of the Code differs from that involved in State v. Lopez, 120 Ariz. 607, 587 P.2d 1184 (1978) and there is no requirement as far as Class 2 or 3 felonies are concerned that the prior conviction must have occurred prior to the date of the present offense. This conclusion is bolstered not only by the language of A.R.S. Sec. 13-604(B) but also by the language of A.R.S. Sec. 13-604(H) which states:

“Convictions for two or more offenses not committed on the same occasion but consolidated for trial purposes, may, at the discretion of the state, be counted as prior convictions for purposes of this section . . . . ”

[579]*579A.R.S. Sec. 13-604(A) which was relied on by the trial court and the real party in interest refers only to Class 4, 5, and 6 felonies which are less serious in nature.

The order of the respondent court dismissing the allegation of the prior offenses is vacated.

HATHAWAY, C. J., and RICHMOND, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI