State v. Hancock

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Hancock

162 S.W.3d 476, 2005 Mo. LEXIS 104, 2005 WL 950045

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedApril 26, 2005

DocketSC 85948

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 S.W.3d 476 (State v. Hancock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hancock, 162 S.W.3d 476, 2005 Mo. LEXIS 104, 2005 WL 950045 (Mo. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Hancock appeals from his felony conviction for driving while intoxicated and his sentence as a persistent offender based on two prior driving while intoxicated convictions. Hancock argues that charging him with a felony based partly on a prior municipal driving while intoxicated conviction violates the Equal Protection clauses of the United States and Missouri Constitutions. 1 This Court has jurisdiction. Mo. Const, art. V, section 3.

*477 Hancock’s contentions are resolved in State of Missouri v. Jeremy Pike, 162 S.W.3d 464, 2005 WL 949692 (Mo. banc 2005) (No. SC86083, decided April 26, 2005). For the reasons stated in that opinion, the judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

1

. U.S. Const, amends. V and XIV; Mo. Const. art. I, sec. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI