State v. Hampton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hampton

541 S.W.3d 635

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 19, 2017

DocketED 104920

StatusPublished

This text of 541 S.W.3d 635 (State v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hampton, 541 S.W.3d 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

*636Niesha Hampton appeals from the judgment entered on her convictions after a jury trial for statutory rape and statutory sodomy. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and we find no other errors. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

*636Niesha Hampton appeals from the judgment entered on her convictions after a jury trial for statutory rape and statutory sodomy. The evidence was sufficient to support the conviction, and we find no other errors. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

541 S.W.3d 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hampton-moctapp-2017.