State v. Hampton

970 S.W.2d 890, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 1998 WL 344530
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1998·No. No. 73058·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of sodomy in the first degree, in violation of section 566.062.1 RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to fifteen years imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

[891]*891We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hampton, 970 S.W.2d 890, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 1998 WL 344530 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

970 S.W.2d 890 (State v. Hampton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hampton v. State
9 S.W.3d 680 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1999)