State v. Hampton

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Hampton

213 So. 2d 773, 252 La. 707, 1968 La. LEXIS 2602

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedSeptember 24, 1968

DocketNo. 49505

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 213 So. 2d 773 (State v. Hampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hampton, 213 So. 2d 773, 252 La. 707, 1968 La. LEXIS 2602 (La. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

In re: Eunice Hampton applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Matthew S. Braniff, Judge of the Criminal District Court for the Parish of Orleans to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 19th day of December, 1968, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

HAMITER and BARHAM!, JJ., are of the opinion that applicant’s remedy is, and she is entitled to, an appeal. See Art. 912 Code of Crim.Proc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI