Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Hammond

State v. Hammond

762 A.2d 911, 255 Conn. 907, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 426
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 16, 2000
DocketSC 16424
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 762 A.2d 911 (State v. Hammond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hammond, 762 A.2d 911, 255 Conn. 907, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 426 (Colo. 2000).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 321 (AC 18702), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was not illegally seized in violation of the fourth amendment to the United States constitution?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s two convictions for possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) did not violate the federal and state prohibitions against double jeopardy?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hammond
778 A.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 A.2d 911, 255 Conn. 907, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hammond-conn-2000.