State v. Hammond
762 A.2d 911, 255 Conn. 907, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 426
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 60 Conn. App. 321 (AC 18702), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant was not illegally seized in violation of the fourth amendment to the United States constitution?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant’s two convictions for possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes § 21a-279 (a) did not violate the federal and state prohibitions against double jeopardy?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hammond, 762 A.2d 911, 255 Conn. 907, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 426 (Colo. 2000).
762 A.2d 911 (State v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hammond
778 A.2d 108 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2001)