State v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Hamilton

197 S.E.2d 592, 18 N.C. App. 679, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1982

CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina

DecidedJuly 11, 1973

DocketNo. 7313SC441

StatusPublished

This text of 197 S.E.2d 592 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamilton, 197 S.E.2d 592, 18 N.C. App. 679, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1982 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s counsel requests this Court to review the record to determine whether prejudicial error was committed at defendant’s trial. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error. The bill of indictment was proper in form; the record affirmatively shows that the plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made; and the sentence imposed is within statutory limits. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Brock and Parker concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORRIS, Judge.

Defendant’s counsel requests this Court to review the record to determine whether prejudicial error was committed at defendant’s trial. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no error. The bill of indictment was proper in form; the record affirmatively shows that the plea of guilty was freely, understandingly and voluntarily made; and the sentence imposed is within statutory limits. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Judges Brock and Parker concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

197 S.E.2d 592, 18 N.C. App. 679, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1982, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-ncctapp-1973.