State v. Hamilton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hamilton

957 S.W.2d 488, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2152, 1997 WL 768455

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hamilton. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 263 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1997·No. No. 69345·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Hamilton, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after he was found guilty of first degree murder, RSMo section 565.020.1 (1986), forcible rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1986), first degree burglary, RSMo section 569.160 (1986), and stealing under $150, RSMo section 570.030 (1986), following a bench trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Robert Hamilton, appeals the judgment of conviction entered by the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis after he was found guilty of first degree murder, RSMo section 565.020.1 (1986), forcible rape, RSMo section 566.030 (1986), first degree burglary, RSMo section 569.160 (1986), and stealing under $150, RSMo section 570.030 (1986), following a bench trial. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the transcript. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hamilton, 957 S.W.2d 488, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 2152, 1997 WL 768455 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

957 S.W.2d 488 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.