State v. Hamilton

729 S.W.2d 519, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3845
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 24, 1987
DocketNo. 51432
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 729 S.W.2d 519 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hamilton, 729 S.W.2d 519, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3845 (Mo. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from use of child-victim's statement in rape case.

The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment. An extended opinion would be of no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.-25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. State
770 S.W.2d 346 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
729 S.W.2d 519, 1987 Mo. App. LEXIS 3845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-moctapp-1987.