State v. Hamilton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Hamilton

568 So. 2d 1378, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 2270, 1990 WL 157565

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 16, 1990

DocketNo. KA 89 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 568 So. 2d 1378 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamilton, 568 So. 2d 1378, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 2270, 1990 WL 157565 (La. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

CRAIN, Judge.

Steven Wayne Hamilton was charged by indictment with second degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. Defendant pled not guilty. After a jury trial he was convicted as charged. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. Defendant appealed, urging ten assignments of error. However, appellant did not file a brief with this Court. Therefore, the assigned errors are deemed abandoned. .See Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4.

A review of the record for errors patent revealed none. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2). Therefore, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CRAIN, Judge.

Steven Wayne Hamilton was charged by indictment with second degree murder, a violation of LSA-R.S. 14:30.1. Defendant pled not guilty. After a jury trial he was convicted as charged. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment at hard labor without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence. Defendant appealed, urging ten assignments of error. However, appellant did not file a brief with this Court. Therefore, the assigned errors are deemed abandoned. .See Uniform Rules— Courts of Appeal, Rule 2-12.4.

A review of the record for errors patent revealed none. See La.C.Cr.P. art. 920(2). Therefore, defendant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.

CONVICTION AND SENTENCE AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 So. 2d 1378, 1990 La. App. LEXIS 2270, 1990 WL 157565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-lactapp-1990.