State v. Hamilton

240 So. 2d 509, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5611
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 27, 1970·No. No. 70-855·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the state from a pretrial order in a criminal prosecution in the circuit court, as authorized by § 924.07 (8) Fla.Stat., F.S.A.1969. The challenged order granted defendants’ motion for severance, opposed by the state, which had elected to try jointly the defendants who were charged by indictment with the crime of murder in the first degree. The defendants, in the presence of each other, had made statements which were self-incriminating and which implicated the other. We find no error in that ruling of the trial court. It represented a matter resting in the discretion of the court (Jackman v. State, Fla.App.1962, 140 So.2d 627; Sylvia v. State, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 286), and [510] in the circumstances presented the order of severance was proper. See Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct. 1620, 20 L.Ed.2d 476.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hamilton, 240 So. 2d 509, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5611 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).

240 So. 2d 509 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fungone v. State
391 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
WB v. State
356 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
W. B. v. State
356 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
State v. Smith
254 So. 2d 402 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)