State v. Hamilton

559 A.2d 1139, 211 Conn. 804, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 150
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 26, 1989·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The State of Connecticut’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 17 Conn. App. 385, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“Did the Appellate Court err in concluding that the seizure of the car keys used to unlock the van where the drugs were stored was not inadvertent and thus did not qualify as a plain view seizure?

“When in the course of a search pursuant to a warrant the police discover keys that may be used to unlock a van that is also authorized to be searched under the warrant, may the keys be seized for that purpose?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hamilton, 559 A.2d 1139, 211 Conn. 804, 1989 Conn. LEXIS 150 (Colo. 1989).

559 A.2d 1139 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hamilton
573 A.2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1990)