State v. Haman

Nebraska Supreme Court

State v. Haman

463 N.W.2d 621, 236 Neb. 750, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 366

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 7, 1990

DocketNo. 89-1488

StatusPublished

This text of 463 N.W.2d 621 (State v. Haman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haman, 463 N.W.2d 621, 236 Neb. 750, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 366 (Neb. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The district court for Douglas County affirmed the judgment of the county court finding appellant guilty of operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was suspended, second offense. The appellant was sentenced to a term of 90 days in the Douglas County Corrections Center and ordered to pay a fine of $500, and his license was suspended for 730 days. Credit was given for pretrial jail time.

A single error is assigned, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. The assignment is without merit.

Without objection, the court received certified copies of a previous counseled conviction of appellant for driving under suspension and a certificate of the Department of Motor Vehicles that on the date of the offense the license had not been reinstated. The testimony of the owner of the car that she was a passenger while the appellant operated the car on the date of the offense is challenged by the appellant as not believable because of the breakup of her previous intimate relationship with the appellant. The court found the owner’s testimony credible.

We do not reweigh facts in a criminal case. State v. Wyatt, 234 Neb. 349, 451 N.W.2d 84 (1990). Since there is sufficient evidence to support the judgment, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The district court for Douglas County affirmed the judgment of the county court finding appellant guilty of operating a motor vehicle while his operator’s license was suspended, second offense. The appellant was sentenced to a term of 90 days in the Douglas County Corrections Center and ordered to pay a fine of $500, and his license was suspended for 730 days. Credit was given for pretrial jail time.

A single error is assigned, that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict. The assignment is without merit.

Without objection, the court received certified copies of a previous counseled conviction of appellant for driving under suspension and a certificate of the Department of Motor Vehicles that on the date of the offense the license had not been reinstated. The testimony of the owner of the car that she was a passenger while the appellant operated the car on the date of the offense is challenged by the appellant as not believable because of the breakup of her previous intimate relationship with the appellant. The court found the owner’s testimony credible.

We do not reweigh facts in a criminal case. State v. Wyatt, 234 Neb. 349, 451 N.W.2d 84 (1990). Since there is sufficient evidence to support the judgment, we affirm.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

463 N.W.2d 621, 236 Neb. 750, 1990 Neb. LEXIS 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haman-neb-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack