State v. Ham

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ham

91 S.W.3d 676, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2303, 2002 WL 31654626

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 26, 2002

DocketED 81695

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 91 S.W.3d 676 (State v. Ham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ham, 91 S.W.3d 676, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2303, 2002 WL 31654626 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Chief Judge.

Donald Ham appeals from the judgment convicting him of third-degree assault. *677 Because there is no final, appealable judgment, we dismiss the appeal.

The appellant was found guilty of third-degree assault by the Franklin County Circuit Court. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed the appellant on probation for two years with conditions. The appellant has now filed his notice of appeal from this judgment.

There is no right of appeal without statutory authority. State v. Williams, 871 S.W.2d 450, 452 (Mo. banc 1994). The right of appeal in criminal cases is limited by statute to final judgments. Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. In criminal cases, a judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). Where imposition of sentence is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 892 (Mo. banc 2002). Here, the court suspended imposition of the appellant’s sentence. As a result, there is no final, appealable judgment.

We have a duty to sua sponte determine whether we have jurisdiction and if we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). We issued an order directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. The appellant’s response concedes that his conviction cannot be appealed. On the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, Chief Judge.

Donald Ham appeals from the judgment convicting him of third-degree assault. *677 Because there is no final, appealable judgment, we dismiss the appeal.

The appellant was found guilty of third-degree assault by the Franklin County Circuit Court. The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed the appellant on probation for two years with conditions. The appellant has now filed his notice of appeal from this judgment.

There is no right of appeal without statutory authority. State v. Williams, 871 S.W.2d 450, 452 (Mo. banc 1994). The right of appeal in criminal cases is limited by statute to final judgments. Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. In criminal cases, a judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo.App. E.D.1993). Where imposition of sentence is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891, 892 (Mo. banc 2002). Here, the court suspended imposition of the appellant’s sentence. As a result, there is no final, appealable judgment.

We have a duty to sua sponte determine whether we have jurisdiction and if we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo.App. E.D.2001). We issued an order directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. The appellant’s response concedes that his conviction cannot be appealed. On the Court’s own motion, the appellant’s appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.

LAWRENCE G. CRAHAN, J., and ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.W.3d 676, 2002 Mo. App. LEXIS 2303, 2002 WL 31654626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ham-moctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack