State v. Haltom
201 S.E.2d 691, 284 N.C. 619, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1309
This text of 201 S.E.2d 691 (State v. Haltom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Haltom, 201 S.E.2d 691, 284 N.C. 619, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1309 (N.C. 1974).
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
William R. HALTOM.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., William W. Melvin, William B. Ray, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the State.
Leath, Bynum & Kitchin, for defendant.
Petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, 19 N.C.App. 646, 199 S.E.2d 708. Denied. Appeal dismissed ex mero motu for lack of substantial constitutional question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Haltom
199 S.E.2d 708 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
201 S.E.2d 691, 284 N.C. 619, 1974 N.C. LEXIS 1309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haltom-nc-1974.