State v. Halsell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Halsell

781 P.2d 875, 99 Or. App. 205, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1641

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedOctober 25, 1989

Docket88-2241A-C-1; CA A50604

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 P.2d 875 (State v. Halsell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Halsell, 781 P.2d 875, 99 Or. App. 205, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1641 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance following a stipulated facts trial to the court, contending that, because the record contains no written waiver of his right to trial by jury, his conviction cannot stand. Defendant is correct. State v. Kendall, 96 Or App 735, 773 P2d 1362, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989); State v. McDaniel, 96 Or App 337, 772 P2d 951, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989).

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance following a stipulated facts trial to the court, contending that, because the record contains no written waiver of his right to trial by jury, his conviction cannot stand. Defendant is correct. State v. Kendall, 96 Or App 735, 773 P2d 1362, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989); State v. McDaniel, 96 Or App 337, 772 P2d 951, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989).

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

781 P.2d 875, 99 Or. App. 205, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-halsell-orctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack