State v. Halsell
781 P.2d 875, 99 Or. App. 205, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1641
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 25, 1989·No. 88-2241A-C-1; CA A50604·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance following a stipulated facts trial to the court, contending that, because the record contains no written waiver of his right to trial by jury, his conviction cannot stand. Defendant is correct. State v. Kendall, 96 Or App 735, 773 P2d 1362, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989); State v. McDaniel, 96 Or App 337, 772 P2d 951, rev den 308 Or 382 (1989).
Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Halsell, 781 P.2d 875, 99 Or. App. 205, 1989 Ore. App. LEXIS 1641 (Or. Ct. App. 1989).
781 P.2d 875 (State v. Halsell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Miles
798 P.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1990)