State v. Hall

170 S.E.2d 379, 253 S.C. 294, 1969 S.C. LEXIS 181
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 28, 1969
Docket18969
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 170 S.E.2d 379 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hall, 170 S.E.2d 379, 253 S.C. 294, 1969 S.C. LEXIS 181 (S.C. 1969).

Opinion

Lewis, Justice.

The defendant Alvin Brooks Hall was indicted for the crime of murder and was convicted of voluntary manslaughter. He contends in this appeal that he is entitled to a new trial because the trial judge erred (1) in the instructions to the jury relative to the burden of proof on the plea of self-defense and (2) in failing to submit, with appropriate instructions, the issue of involuntary manslaughter. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

The defendant did not raise the objections to the instructions at the trial, although full opportunity was afforded to do so in compliance with the provisions of Section 10-1210 of the 1962 Code of Laws (also appearing as Section 17-513.1). The failure of defendant to object or to request additional instructions, when opportunity was afforded, constituted a waiver of any right to complain on appeal of errors in the charge.

Affirmed.

Moss, C. J., and Bussey, Brailsford and Littlejohn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williams
223 S.E.2d 38 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1976)
State v. Langston
216 S.E.2d 875 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1975)
State v. Bradford
180 S.E.2d 632 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 S.E.2d 379, 253 S.C. 294, 1969 S.C. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-sc-1969.