Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hall

State v. Hall

823 P.2d 1042, 111 Or. App. 406, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 384
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedFebruary 12, 1992
Docket90C-20815; CA A66678
StatusPublished

This text of 823 P.2d 1042 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hall, 823 P.2d 1042, 111 Or. App. 406, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 384 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals his conviction for delivery of, conspiracy to deliver and possession of methamphetamine and three counts of endangering the welfare of a minor. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal. The evidence was sufficient to support the convictions.

Defendant also assigns error to the trial court’s imposition of sentence. The state concedes that the trial court erred in sentencing defendant under the “scheme or network” provision of OAR 253-04-004. State v. Moeller, 105 Or App 434, 806 P2d 130, rev dismissed 312 Or 76, 815 P2d 701 (1991); State v. Medina, 111 Or App 108, 823 P2d 453 (1992).

Convictions affirmed; remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Medina
823 P.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)
State v. Moeller
806 P.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1991)
State v. Moeller
815 P.2d 701 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1991)
State v. Medina
823 P.2d 453 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
823 P.2d 1042, 111 Or. App. 406, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-orctapp-1992.