State v. Hall

635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 9, 1981·No. No. G-81-14, CA A21111·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 US 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 US 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).

Reversed and remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hall, 635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

635 P.2d 681 (State v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Ventresca
380 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Boggs v. United States
441 U.S. 965 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Perkins v. United States
441 U.S. 965 (Supreme Court, 1979)