State v. Hall

635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 9, 1981
DocketNo. G-81-14, CA A21111
StatusPublished

This text of 635 P.2d 681 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hall, 635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821 (Or. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 US 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 US 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).

Reversed and remanded for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Ventresca
380 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1965)
Boggs v. United States
441 U.S. 965 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Perkins v. United States
441 U.S. 965 (Supreme Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-orctapp-1981.