State v. Hall
This text of 635 P.2d 681 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The state appeals a trial court order suppressing evidence seized pursuant to a warrant. The trial court found the affidavit in support of the warrant insufficient. We find the challenged affidavit establishes probable cause. See United States v. Ventresca, 380 US 102, 85 S Ct 741, 13 L Ed 2d 684 (1965); United States v. Allen, 588 F2d 1100, 1106 (5th Cir), cert den sub nom Perkins v. United States, 441 US 965, 99 S Ct 2415, 60 L Ed 2d 1071 (1979).
Reversed and remanded for trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
635 P.2d 681, 54 Or. App. 679, 1981 Ore. App. LEXIS 3821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-orctapp-1981.