State v. Hall
This text of 381 N.W.2d 926 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant’s sole assignment of error is that the district court accepted his plea of nolo contendere and sentenced him to a term of imprisonment for a felony on a trial record which was totally silent concerning whether defendant had knowledge of the maximum and minimum penalties which could be imposed, and without the court’s making a finding that defendant had voluntarily and intelligently waived his rights by so pleading.
The State, in effect, confesses error. Accordingly, as required *52 by State v. Fischer, 218 Neb. 678, 357 N.W.2d 477 (1984), and State v. Curnyn, 202 Neb. 135, 274 N.W.2d 157 (1979), we remand the cause to the district court for further proceedings as mandated by those cases.
Remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
381 N.W.2d 926, 222 Neb. 51, 1986 Neb. LEXIS 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-neb-1986.