Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Hall

State v. Hall

209 S.E.2d 408, 23 N.C. App. 553, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2153
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 6, 1974
DocketNo. 744SC738
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 209 S.E.2d 408 (State v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hall, 209 S.E.2d 408, 23 N.C. App. 553, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2153 (N.C. Ct. App. 1974).

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

The defendant makes two assignments of error in the record, but as these assignments are not argued in the brief, they are deemed abandoned. (Court of Appeals Rule 28.) However, an appeal is an exception to the judgment, presenting the face of the record proper for review. The record in this case consists of the warrant, the defendant’s plea of not guilty, the evidence offered at trial, the jury verdict of guilty, and the judgment imposed. We have carefully reviewed this record and find no error.

No error.

Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dominguez
650 S.E.2d 675 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 S.E.2d 408, 23 N.C. App. 553, 1974 N.C. App. LEXIS 2153, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hall-ncctapp-1974.